SVETLANA PANASYUK
Home
Resume
Publications

Medical Hyperspectral Imaging
Basics
Device
Diabetes
Wounds
Cancer
Shock

Optical Metrology
Defects
Medical
Automotive

Tissue Spectroscopy
Fluorescence
D-Reflectance
Device

Mantle Flow
Convection
Drift
Geoid
Compressibility
Inversion
Topography
Phases
Superplasticity
Hemisphere

GPS
Tien Shan
GPS
Sky Map
Errors

Remote Sensing
Vectors
Satellites

Image Processing
Deblurring
Registration
Recognition

Fun
Geosystems
Colormap
Chaos
Bubbles
Harmonics

Reference Earth Model
about
data
map_view
slice
isosurface
rms
correlation
vis5D

RedBallGeoid is an equipotential surface.

Rotating Geoid If our Earth would be a 100% water covered planet, its surface would look like a travel case: squashed from above-to-below and from side-to-side.

Actually, if you look at it from space you probably won't see the side-to-side anomalies because they are relatively small compare to the ellipsoidal one. But if you'd put on 'magic glasses' which enhance the anomalies relative to the Earth radius, that's what you'd see from the space! The North pole is up. The black vertical line cuts along Greenwich.

But, of course, when we say 'Geoid Anomaly' - we would rather imagine a steady picture: Geoid Anomaly

Here we took off the ellipticity (as due to the Earth rotation), and displayed the Geoid Anomalies using interrupted Hammer-Aitoff projection with the continents sketched with white line on the background.

This topography of an equipotential surface is about +/- 100 meters, and it is a clear representation of the lateral variations in the Earth density!

Those density contrasts drive the mantle flow: the lighter rocks flow up and the denser ones sink down, very-very slowly.

Schematically I view it like this:

Earth slice Imagine a slice through the Earth, as in picture on right. The dark gray is inner core: greatly hot-pressed solid metallic ball. The light gray is outer core: hot but not as greatly pressed as the inner core material - and therefore it's in a liquid state, giggling and convecting at high rates of several km per year (some places reaching 10-20 km/year!! - it's like 2 meters in hour). Above is the mostly silicate rock mantle (white layer in picture, although most abundant rock in upper 600-km of mantle looks like light-green glass). The mantle creeps very slow (about couple centimeters per year) driven by the gravitationally unstable blocks of rocks. Light-density, hotter rocks are colored reddish here and the heavier (cooler) chunks are bluish.
Since mantle is extremely viscous (on geological time scales), its flow causes topography at all outer boundaries (surface, which is covered with the blue ocean, and the core-mantle boundary).

The deviations of density from the spherically symmetric distribution cause an anomaly in the potential field of our planet. This anomaly detects itself through the deflections of an ocean surface (which merely coincides with the equipotential level). To determine how much of this deflection is due to the primary-source (the density contrasts in the mantle) and how much is due to the boundary deflection (the secondary source), we have to know the rheology of the media surrounding a mass anomaly. Should one know the exact density structure and the viscosity of the Earth, one can repeat the very real mantle motion and reconstruct the topography and geoid.

Here I illustrate how the equipotential surface reacts to the changes in the rheology of the media surrounding a mass anomaly:

Let's consider 2D-Cartesian geometry, for simplicity. When no mass anomaly is present in the media (mantle), the equipotential surface is flat (here it's called a reference equipotential surface and is shown by black line)

Potential&Mass 1

Now we add a heavy mass anomaly. In a rigid media (we do not allow any motion) it causes a 'cavity' in the gravitational potential field, so it shows up as a bulge in the equipotential surface: positive geoid anomaly (blue line)

Potential&Mass 2

Holding the mass anomaly still, we allow the media to respond to the change in the gravitational field: its free upper surface would be pulled up to equilibrate (to line up) with the equpotential level (effect of self-gravitation). Thus created topography (I call it secondary mass anomaly) would re-adjust the potential field (and geoid, green line).

Potential&Mass 3

Now we let the mass anomaly to sink down. The viscous stresses of the generated flow pull the upper boundary down creating another secondary mass anomaly (so called dynamic topography) which is, by the way, has an opposite sign (lack of mass at the surface) and causes an opposite-sign (negative) anomaly of the geoid (magenta line).

Potential&Mass 4
What we observe on the Earth surface is the total geoid anomaly (black solid line), which is the sum of all these contributions from the primary density anomaly (blue), the dynamic topography (magenta), and the self-gravitation (green). Although primary source can be inferred from numerous seismic tomography models, the two latter contributions (which provide about same-amplitude compensating effect) depend on the rheology of our planet, and therefore are much more ambiguous.